I am
going to have to apologize in advance. I am a bit of an ass when it comes to
western conceptions of "mental health." As I am going through a super huge
rough life change and am rather angry at all institutions that seem to only use
logic and historical fact when it applies to its own justification, in addition
to dispelling or mineralizing anything that may ebb at its self-proposed
superiority.
I was
raised by parents with backgrounds in mental health an am still appalled at the
standardized tradition of ignoring most conceptions of health that skew outside
of a classical monotheistic/ western tradition. Christian concepts of sin have shaped and dictated what both illness and deviance are in the western systems. So far, literature has barely
acknowledged that this is a myopic viewpoint. But beyond realizing that our
accepted norms of society and health are essentially westernized monotheistic traditions,
the "sociology of health and mental illness" seems to ignore most of
the variety of global concepts of existence as well as historical concepts of
the self. Again, those outside of the monotheistic traditions, excluding one of
its most contemporary interpretations, Islam (I give the Mormons credit, where
temporal credit is due) are largely ignored when it comes to institutions of
health in this country. So I question a field of study where it seems the most
basic questions of the larger whole appear to go unasked.
No comments:
Post a Comment